UN top court finds key labour treaty protects workers' right to strike

Text to Speech Icon

Listen to this article

Estimated 3 minutes

The audio version of this article is generated by AI-based technology. Mispronunciations can occur. We are working with our partners to continually review and improve the results.

The United Nations top court issued a landmark advisory opinion on the right to strike on Thursday, finding that a cornerstone labour treaty protects the ability of workers to walk off the job.

The  International Court of Justice (ICJ) was asked in 2023 by the International Labour Organization, a UN agency, to settle an internal dispute over whether one of the ILO's conventions gives workers the right to strike.  

Advisory opinions aren't legally binding but carry significant weight. The decision could have a worldwide impact on labour regulations, enshrining the right to strike in labour standards and international trade agreements.

The word "strike" never appears in the 1948 Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organize Convention, but the ICJ's 14 judges found walkout actions are covered under the other guarantees.

"The protection of the right to strike is encompassed in the freedom of association," court president Yuji Iwasawa said, reading out the ruling in the Great Hall of Justice in The Hague.

The convention has been ratified by 158 countries, including Canada, and is incorporated into a variety of employment guidelines and standards, including those from the United Nations, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development and various international trade agreements.

The United States is a member of the ILO but hasn't ratified the convention.

International labour law expert Paul van der Heijden said that the advisory opinion from the ICJ gives workers an important tool when their actions face legal opposition. This decision "is important when you go to court," he told The Associated Press.

The judges were careful to note that in some cases, the right to strike may be restricted. The opinion "does not entail any determination on the precise content, scope or conditions for the exercise of that right," Iwasawa said.

Woman in skirt suit pulls luggage in front of electronic board listing flight information.An Air Canada flight attendant arrives at Toronto Pearson International Airport after the end of a labour strike in Toronto last August. Thursday's ruling could strengthen workers' right to strike. (Carlos Osorio/Reuters)

A number of UN agencies can ask the ICJ to weigh in on legal questions and issue advisory opinions. Last year, the court said in a  landmark advisory opinion that countries could be in violation of international law if they fail to take measures to protect the planet from climate change.  

During hearings in October, the court in The Hague heard from 18 countries and five international organizations, including the ILO, with a number of other countries submitting writing arguments.

The majority of participants favoured the right to strike, a protection which is already granted in most European countries.

Comments (0)
No login
gif
color_lens
Login or register to post your comment